<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trendy India defies the rest of the world &#8211; huh!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sukshma.net/2006/11/21/trendy-india-defies-the-rest-of-the-world/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sukshma.net/2006/11/21/trendy-india-defies-the-rest-of-the-world/</link>
	<description>subtle threads between self, work &#38; life.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 05:03:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Santosh</title>
		<link>http://sukshma.net/2006/11/21/trendy-india-defies-the-rest-of-the-world/#comment-1894</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Santosh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 15:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sdawara.wordpress.com/2006/11/21/trendy-india-defies-the-rest-of-the-world/#comment-1894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Prateek, 
I believe Google Trends will only compare search term frequencies, so drawing any conclusions from the reports is at your own risk. 
Also note that Google stems searches. So &#039;newspapers&#039; might also result in a search for just &#039;newspaper&#039;, similarly &#039;blogs&#039; are stemmed to just &#039;blog&#039;. Here is a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/trends?q=newspaper%2C+newspapers&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;trend report for &#039;newspaper&#039; versus &#039;newspapers&#039;&lt;/a&gt;. Search frequency for &#039;newspaper&#039; is always higher than &#039;newspapers&#039; - possibly due to stemming. Nevertheless, notice that the two trend lines follow each other closely.
Then of course there are searches for synonyms, other variants and like you pointed out - why would a consumer search for &#039;TV&#039;. For the same reasons, why just search for &#039;movies&#039;? And yet, here is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/trends?q=film%2C+movies%2C+cinema&amp;ctab=0&amp;geo=all&amp;date=all&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;another trend report for &#039;movies&#039;,  &#039;films&#039;, &#039;cinema&#039;&lt;/a&gt;. The report clearly shows the only safe conclusion is each trend line itself - don&#039;t rely on the volumes.
Finally, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/trends?q=Television%2C+TV%2C+HBO%2C+ESPN%2C+Star&amp;ctab=0&amp;geo=all&amp;date=all&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here is another trend report comparing the search terms &#039;TV&#039;, &#039;Television&#039;, &#039;ESPN&#039;, and &#039;Star&#039;&lt;/a&gt;. The report clearly shows people do search for TV. Here too, there is more than what simply meets the eye. Could it be that Google treats a search for &#039;Star TV&#039; and &#039;TV&#039; as the same?
Again, draw conclusions at your own risk :). Thank you for your observations and for stopping by!
- Santosh

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Prateek,<br />
I believe Google Trends will only compare search term frequencies, so drawing any conclusions from the reports is at your own risk.<br />
Also note that Google stems searches. So &#8216;newspapers&#8217; might also result in a search for just &#8216;newspaper&#8217;, similarly &#8216;blogs&#8217; are stemmed to just &#8216;blog&#8217;. Here is a <a href="http://www.google.com/trends?q=newspaper%2C+newspapers" rel="nofollow">trend report for &#8216;newspaper&#8217; versus &#8216;newspapers&#8217;</a>. Search frequency for &#8216;newspaper&#8217; is always higher than &#8216;newspapers&#8217; &#8211; possibly due to stemming. Nevertheless, notice that the two trend lines follow each other closely.<br />
Then of course there are searches for synonyms, other variants and like you pointed out &#8211; why would a consumer search for &#8216;TV&#8217;. For the same reasons, why just search for &#8216;movies&#8217;? And yet, here is <a href="http://www.google.com/trends?q=film%2C+movies%2C+cinema&amp;ctab=0&amp;geo=all&amp;date=all" rel="nofollow">another trend report for &#8216;movies&#8217;,  &#8216;films&#8217;, &#8216;cinema&#8217;</a>. The report clearly shows the only safe conclusion is each trend line itself &#8211; don&#8217;t rely on the volumes.<br />
Finally, <a href="http://www.google.com/trends?q=Television%2C+TV%2C+HBO%2C+ESPN%2C+Star&amp;ctab=0&amp;geo=all&amp;date=all" rel="nofollow">here is another trend report comparing the search terms &#8216;TV&#8217;, &#8216;Television&#8217;, &#8216;ESPN&#8217;, and &#8216;Star&#8217;</a>. The report clearly shows people do search for TV. Here too, there is more than what simply meets the eye. Could it be that Google treats a search for &#8216;Star TV&#8217; and &#8216;TV&#8217; as the same?<br />
Again, draw conclusions at your own risk <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> . Thank you for your observations and for stopping by!<br />
- Santosh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the Navigator &#187; Blog Archive &#187; trendy india</title>
		<link>http://sukshma.net/2006/11/21/trendy-india-defies-the-rest-of-the-world/#comment-1892</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[the Navigator &#187; Blog Archive &#187; trendy india]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 03:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sdawara.wordpress.com/2006/11/21/trendy-india-defies-the-rest-of-the-world/#comment-1892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] In India, movies have always been more popular than TV and blogs are more popular than newspapers with the online community. DesiPundit points to Santosh Dawara who uses Google Trends to demonstrate &#8220;how certain trends in India are in contrast with the rest of the world&#8221;. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In India, movies have always been more popular than TV and blogs are more popular than newspapers with the online community. DesiPundit points to Santosh Dawara who uses Google Trends to demonstrate &#8220;how certain trends in India are in contrast with the rest of the world&#8221;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prateek</title>
		<link>http://sukshma.net/2006/11/21/trendy-india-defies-the-rest-of-the-world/#comment-1889</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Prateek]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 22:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sdawara.wordpress.com/2006/11/21/trendy-india-defies-the-rest-of-the-world/#comment-1889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting analysis but some dangerous assumptions. Note that I don&#039;t agree or disagree with your conclusions, just pointing out some flaws
1) Who searches for &#039;TV&#039; anyway? Wouldn&#039;t you type in a channel or a show?
3) Try changing &#039;newspapers&#039; to &#039;newspaper&#039;. The result is reversed. Wouldn&#039;t most people type in the name of a newspaper?
6) Also need to consider different ways of spelling- e.g. &#039;Shahrukh&#039;, &#039;Amir&#039; etc. 
&#039;Amitabh&#039; is neck-and-neck with &#039;Shahrukh&#039; in India, but that is not the case outside India.
10) &#039;marriage&#039; and &#039;wedding&#039; trump both of those
11) &#039;stocks&#039; beat both shares and mutual funds
12) Kolkata and Pune still holding strong! :)
13)  No real trend here except that the volume of searches jumps exponentially whenever there&#039;s a controversy.
15) &#039;tandoori&#039; is head and shoulders above everything else]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting analysis but some dangerous assumptions. Note that I don&#8217;t agree or disagree with your conclusions, just pointing out some flaws<br />
1) Who searches for &#8216;TV&#8217; anyway? Wouldn&#8217;t you type in a channel or a show?<br />
3) Try changing &#8216;newspapers&#8217; to &#8216;newspaper&#8217;. The result is reversed. Wouldn&#8217;t most people type in the name of a newspaper?<br />
6) Also need to consider different ways of spelling- e.g. &#8216;Shahrukh&#8217;, &#8216;Amir&#8217; etc.<br />
&#8216;Amitabh&#8217; is neck-and-neck with &#8216;Shahrukh&#8217; in India, but that is not the case outside India.<br />
10) &#8216;marriage&#8217; and &#8216;wedding&#8217; trump both of those<br />
11) &#8216;stocks&#8217; beat both shares and mutual funds<br />
12) Kolkata and Pune still holding strong! <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
13)  No real trend here except that the volume of searches jumps exponentially whenever there&#8217;s a controversy.<br />
15) &#8216;tandoori&#8217; is head and shoulders above everything else</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DesiPundit &#187; Archives &#187; Trends, And Suchlike</title>
		<link>http://sukshma.net/2006/11/21/trendy-india-defies-the-rest-of-the-world/#comment-1886</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DesiPundit &#187; Archives &#187; Trends, And Suchlike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sdawara.wordpress.com/2006/11/21/trendy-india-defies-the-rest-of-the-world/#comment-1886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Santosh Dawara uses Google Trends to demonstrate how certain trends in India are in contrast with the rest of the world, while unearthing some other amusing facts. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Santosh Dawara uses Google Trends to demonstrate how certain trends in India are in contrast with the rest of the world, while unearthing some other amusing facts. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

